Question

which statement logically and reasonably supports the claim that dylan should not be awarded the nobel prize in literature?
bob dylans outstanding career as a singer and songwriter have made him known around the world, and qualify him for any award outside of the music industry.
traditionally, the nobel prize in literature has been awarded to writers of prose and poetry, while musicians like bob dylan have been honored by awards reserved for musicians.
lyrics are made up of words that tell a story, often rhyme, and are set to music; therefore, bob dylan should not be awarded the nobel prize in literature, because he writes lyrics.
those who voted to award bob dylan the nobel prize in literature are qualified professionals who know what they are doing.

Explanation:

This question asks for a statement that logically supports denying Bob Dylan the Nobel Prize in Literature.

1. The first option argues he qualifies for non-music awards, which contradicts the claim.
2. The second option references tradition: the prize goes to prose/poetry writers, while musicians get music awards. This provides a consistent, reasonable precedent to support not awarding him.
3. The third option makes an unsupported leap: it defines lyrics but does not logically connect that definition to excluding them from literature.
4. The fourth option supports awarding him, as it affirms the voters' competence.

Answer:

B. Traditionally, the Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to writers of prose and poetry, while musicians like Bob Dylan have been honored by awards reserved for musicians.