Question

architecture
the modern philosophy of \out with the old, in with the new\
has been used and abused for years. often times, it has more to
do with making a profit rather than a legitimate need for
something new. across the united states, beautiful, historic
architecture is frequently destroyed to make way for malls, high-
rise apartment buildings, grandiose homes, and other structures.
unfortunately, little is done to protect our history.

over the past several years, it has become increasingly
common for big - name developers to tear down victorian,
craftsman, and colonial buildings. this destruction is often
performed with the thought that it is the property that holds the
true value, not the structure that sits on it. likewise, homeowners
have begun to value their propertys location over the house they
have spent many years living in. little regard is given to the
painstaking details and craftsmanship that went into these
buildings, not the innate beauty of hand - carved woodwork and
decorations. \out with the old, in with the new\ has resulted in
people no longer appreciating the history and artistic integrity of
our countrys oldest buildings and failing to realize that once \the
new\ is brought in, \the old\ is lost to us forever.

it is bad enough that developers and private citizens are blind
to the beauty around them; what is worse is that local
governments refuse to step in and prevent this destruction. cities
and towns need to stand up to large developers that flash money
around in the name of progress. rather than allowing developers
to tear down old buildings simply to put up new ones, local
governments could enact ordinances to preserve their areas
architecture. if an old building is unusable or unsafe as it is, the
structure could be restored instead of demolished; not only would
this save one - of - a - kind architecture, it is also an extremely
environmentally - conscience concept because less building
material is used and wasted.

in addition, local governments could prevent homeowners
from tearing down their homes if the buildings are of a historic
nature. town officials could easily draw up legislation to preserve
all buildings erected before a certain date, which would effectively
prevent anyone from destroying historic architecture or buying
property with express intent of rebuilding on the land.

if local governments take more of an interest in their towns

20
select the correct answer

read the sentence from the passage.

rather than allowing developers to tear down old buildings simply to put up new ones, local governments could enact ordinances
to preserve their areas architecture.

how does this sentence develop the claim in the passage?

a. it begins to describe the problems the writer wants to highlight

b. it summarizes the writers attitude toward government involvement in architecture.

c. it begins to introduce solutions to the problems the writer raises.

d. it concludes the writers discussion of modern architecture

reset next

Explanation:

The passage's core claim is that historic architecture is being destroyed unnecessarily, and the sentence proposes local governments enact ordinances to stop this. This is a proposed solution to the raised problem of historic building demolition, rather than describing problems, summarizing attitude, or concluding the discussion.

Answer:

C. It begins to introduce solutions to the problems the writer raises.