QUESTION IMAGE
Question
choose the correct word to complete each sentence. answers may be used more than once.
choose of states’ rights arguments about the issue of slavery believed that states had the power to prohibit or allow slavery within their borders.
choose of states’ rights arguments about slavery believed that the national government could prohibit or allow the expansion of slavery in territories.
choose of the states’ rights arguments might point to the dred scott decision to support their position.
To solve this, we analyze each sentence based on states' rights and slavery arguments:
Sentence 1:
Supporters of states’ rights (Proponents) argued states could regulate slavery within their borders. So the first blank is "Proponents".
Sentence 2:
Opponents of states’ rights (or those favoring federal power, like Opponents of strict states’ rights) believed the national government controlled slavery in territories. So the second blank is "Opponents".
Sentence 3:
The Dred Scott decision limited federal power over slavery, so Supporters of states’ rights might use it to support their position (as it upheld states’ authority in slavery matters).
Final Answers:
- Proponents
- Opponents
- Supporters
(Note: The exact answer choices depend on the provided options, but the reasoning aligns with historical context: Proponents of states’ rights (for state sovereignty over slavery), Opponents (for federal/territorial control), and Supporters (using Dred Scott to back state authority).)
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
To solve this, we analyze each sentence based on states' rights and slavery arguments:
Sentence 1:
Supporters of states’ rights (Proponents) argued states could regulate slavery within their borders. So the first blank is "Proponents".
Sentence 2:
Opponents of states’ rights (or those favoring federal power, like Opponents of strict states’ rights) believed the national government controlled slavery in territories. So the second blank is "Opponents".
Sentence 3:
The Dred Scott decision limited federal power over slavery, so Supporters of states’ rights might use it to support their position (as it upheld states’ authority in slavery matters).
Final Answers:
- Proponents
- Opponents
- Supporters
(Note: The exact answer choices depend on the provided options, but the reasoning aligns with historical context: Proponents of states’ rights (for state sovereignty over slavery), Opponents (for federal/territorial control), and Supporters (using Dred Scott to back state authority).)