Question

conflict
“my dear fellow,” said the general, “have i not told you i always mean what i say about hunting? this is really an inspiration. i drink to a foeman worthy of my steel—at last.”
at this point in the story, the conflict changes from clashing viewpoints to physical opposition. are the opponents equally matched, or does one character have an advantage over the other? explain.
type here

Explanation:

The general seems to be a skilled and experienced hunter. If the other character is his hunting - target (implied by the context of hunting and "foeman"), the general has advantages like knowledge of the land (if it's his territory), hunting skills, and access to weapons. However, the hunted may have the element of surprise and a strong will to survive. Overall, the general likely has an initial advantage due to his experience and resources, but the hunted's determination could level the playing field.

Answer:

The general likely has an initial advantage because of his hunting experience and resources, but the hunted's will to survive may make them more evenly - matched.