Question

the court remained unconvinced, therefore, that when wearing jeans would actually impair the learning process of kevin or of his fellow classmates. kevin bannisters case was significant in that it was the first in the united states to address clothing prohibitions of a school dress code. his challenge initiated a review, of students rights and administrative responsibility in public education. 40. f. no change g. thus, h. moreover, j. however, 41. a. no change b. by wearing c. wearing d. having worn 42. which choice would most effectively open this paragraph and convey the importance of this case? f. no change g. therefore, kevins case reminds us that you should stand up for your rights, no matter how old you are. h. the case for personal liberty means the right to speak up must be taken seriously by the courts. j. all in all, clothing is an important part of our identity. 43. a. no change b. review, of students rights, c. review of students rights d. review of students rights, 44. f. no change g. on h. with j. about question 45 asks about the preceding passage as a whole. 45. suppose the writers goal had been to write a brief persuasive essay urging students to exercise their constitutional rights. would this essay fulfill that goal? a. yes, because the essay focuses on how kevin encouraged other students to exercise their constitutional rights. b. yes, because the essay focuses on various types of clothing historically worn by students as a freedom of expression. c. no, because the essay suggests that the right to wear blue jeans was not a substantial constitutional right in the 1970s. d. no, because the essay objectively reports on one case of a student exercising a particular constitutional right.

Explanation:

1. "however" es la conjunción adecuada para expresar la oposición entre la inconvicción del tribunal y la idea de que el uso de jeans afecte el aprendizaje.
2. La forma correcta es "wearing" ya que se refiere a la acción general de usar jeans.
3. La opción H enfatiza la importancia del caso en términos de los derechos individuales y la atención que deben recibir los tribunales.
4. No se necesita coma después de "review", así que la opción C es correcta.
5. "of" es la preposición correcta para indicar el objeto de la revisión.
6. El ensayo solo narra el caso de Kevin, no anima a los estudiantes a ejercer sus derechos constitucionales, por lo que la respuesta es D.

Answer:

1. J. however
2. C. wearing
3. H. The case for personal liberty means the right to speak up must be taken seriously by the courts.
4. C. review of students’ rights
5. F. NO CHANGE
6. D. No, because the essay objectively reports on one case of a student exercising a particular constitutional right.