QUESTION IMAGE
Question
he duly set at each of our general courts annually. all breaches of this order to be punished proportioned to the value of the oppression... this court... in the interim recommends (that) all tradesmen and laborers consider the religious end of their callings, which is that receiving such moderate profit as may enable them to serve god and their neighbors with their arts and trades comfortably, they do not enrich themselves suddenly and inordinately by oppressing prices and wages to the impoverishing (of) their neighbors. live in the practice of that crying sin of oppression, but avoid it. what type of source is this? (primary or secondary and what is it?) what is the bias of the author, as it relates to this essay question? what might account for this bias? what is the overall goal of this document? looking at the goal of this document and the arguments used to make its point, what may be deduced about the society in connecticut? document 6 source: captain john smith, history of virginia, 1624 when the (large ship) departed,... those of us that had money, spare clothes, credit to give bills of payment, gold rings, fur, or any such commodities, were ever welcome to purchase supplies. the rest of us patiently obeyed our vile commanders and (bought) our provisions at fifteen times the value... yet did not repine but fasted, lest we should incur the censure of (being) factious and seditious persons... our ordinary food was but meal and water so that this little relieved our wants, whereby with the extremity of the bitter cold frost,... more than half of us died. the worst (among us were the gold seekers who) with their golden promises made all men their slaves in hope of recompenses. there was no talk... but dig gold, wash gold, refine gold, load gold... smith, perceiving (w lived) from hand to mouth, caused the pinnance (a small ship) to be provided with things fitting to get provision for the year following. (two councilors) wingfield and kendall... strengthened themselves with the sailors and other confederates (and planned to go) aboard the pinnance to alter her course and to go for england. smith had the plot discovered to him. much trouble he had to prevent it, till with store of saker and musket shot he forced them to stay or sink in the river, which action cost the life of captain kendall. these brawls are so disgustful, as some will say, they are better forgotten. what type of source is this? (primary or secondary and what is it?) what is the bias of the author, as it relates to this essay question? what might account for this bias?
A primary source is an original document or firsthand account from the time period under study. Captain John Smith's History of Virginia is a firsthand account of the early Virginia settlement. The bias analysis is based on the common human tendency to present oneself favorably in historical records, especially when one has played a significant role in the events described.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
For Document 6:
- What type of source is this? (Primary or secondary and WHAT is it?): Primary source, a historical account from Captain John Smith's History of Virginia, 1624.
- What is the bias of the author, as it relates to this essay question? What might account for this bias?: Captain John Smith may have a bias towards portraying himself as a heroic figure who foiled plots and tried to maintain order. This bias could be accounted for by his desire to present his actions in a positive light and to justify his role in the early - Virginia settlement.