Question

highlight the claim, evidence, and reasoning in the paragraph below. state governments should not allow residents to water their lawns during droughts. lawn watering is not a basic necessity and requires a lot of water, making this practice a luxury that communities simply cannot afford during a drought. the environmental protection agency reports that, nationwide, “landscape irrigation” uses up about 9 billion gallons of water each day. during a water shortage, state governments should get involved to put this water to better use serving residents’ actual needs.

Explanation:

The claim is the main argument. The evidence is a fact - based report. The reasoning connects the evidence to the claim by explaining why lawn - watering is not a necessity during droughts.

Answer:

Claim: State governments should not allow residents to water their lawns during droughts.
Evidence: The Environmental Protection Agency reports that, nationwide, "landscape irrigation" uses up about 9 billion gallons of water each day.
Reasoning: Lawn watering is not a basic necessity and requires a lot of water, making this practice a luxury that communities simply cannot afford during a drought. During a water shortage, state governments should get involved to put this water to better use serving residents' actual needs.