Question

historians use evidence to support both arguments. match the evidence to the historians who would use it to support their argument.
all of the cities were designed with the same layout. this suggests that one powerful person was making the decisions about city designs.
different cities were located near different natural resources. each city could use its natural resources to make goods to trade with other cities. trading goods made some cities wealthy.
historians
evidence
historians who believe the harappan civilization was made up of many city - states
historians who believe the harappan civilization was one large kingdom

Explanation:

• For historians believing Harappan was many city - states: The evidence about different cities near different resources, trading to get wealthy fits. City - states are independent, so trading between them (using their own resources) makes sense.
• For historians believing Harappan was one large kingdom: The evidence about same city layout (one powerful person deciding) fits a kingdom with central control.

Answer:

Historians who believe the Harappan civilization was made up of many city - states: Different cities were located near different natural resources. Each city could use its natural resources to make goods to trade with other cities. Trading goods made some cities wealthy.
Historians who believe the Harappan civilization was one large kingdom: All of the cities were designed with the same layout. This suggests that one powerful person was making the decisions about city designs.