how might sitcoms harm society?
| harm how? | quote | article |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | upon closer examination, these headlines tell only a fraction of the extent of american tv’s racial humor, which exists in a murky moral zone, since it’s not intended to be offensive yet often contains disparaging takeaways. | https://slate.com/culture/2018/05/american-sitcoms-are-dealing-more-openly-with-race-but-not-always-getting-it-right.html |
| | but there is psychological research on humour that denigrates, belittles, or maligns an individual or social group that argues the opposite. this work has found that such jokes act “as a releaser of existing prejudice” | https://docs.google.com/document/d/19paerr6bvtnz7qjhpwqyjlnoxnvbhhtt7p2ibc4xq/edit?usp=sharing |
| | disparagement humor is paradoxical: it simultaneously communicates two conflicting messages. | https://theconversation.com/psychology-behind-the-unfunny-consequences-of-jokes-that-denigrate-63855 |
step #2 well be watching the sitcoms provided and finding examples that support what weve discussed.
laughing together at others’ expense? laughing image via www.shutterstock.com.
jokes that release restraints
most of the time prejudiced people conceal their true beliefs and attitudes because they fear others’ criticism. they express prejudice only when the norms in a given context clearly communicate approval to do so. they need something in the immediate environment to signal that it is safe to freely express their prejudice.
disparagement humor appears to do just that by affecting people’s understanding of the social norms – implicit rules of acceptable conduct – in the immediate context. and in a variety of experiments, my colleagues and i have found support for this idea, which we call prejudiced norm theory.
for instance, in studies, men higher in hostile sexism – antagonism against women – reported greater tolerance of gender harassment in the workplace upon exposure to sexist versus neutral (nonsexist) jokes. men higher in hostile sexism also recommended greater funding cuts to a women’s organization at their university after watching sexist versus neutral comedy skits. even more disturbing, other researchers found that men higher in hostile sexism expressed greater willingness to rape a woman upon exposure to sexist versus nonsexist humor.

Question

how might sitcoms harm society?
| harm how? | quote | article |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | upon closer examination, these headlines tell only a fraction of the extent of american tv’s racial humor, which exists in a murky moral zone, since it’s not intended to be offensive yet often contains disparaging takeaways. | https://slate.com/culture/2018/05/american-sitcoms-are-dealing-more-openly-with-race-but-not-always-getting-it-right.html |
|  | but there is psychological research on humour that denigrates, belittles, or maligns an individual or social group that argues the opposite. this work has found that such jokes act “as a releaser of existing prejudice” | https://docs.google.com/document/d/19paerr6bvtnz7qjhpwqyjlnoxnvbhhtt7p2ibc4xq/edit?usp=sharing |
|  | disparagement humor is paradoxical: it simultaneously communicates two conflicting messages. | https://theconversation.com/psychology-behind-the-unfunny-consequences-of-jokes-that-denigrate-63855 |
step #2 well be watching the sitcoms provided and finding examples that support what weve discussed.
laughing together at others’ expense? laughing image via www.shutterstock.com.
jokes that release restraints
most of the time prejudiced people conceal their true beliefs and attitudes because they fear others’ criticism. they express prejudice only when the norms in a given context clearly communicate approval to do so. they need something in the immediate environment to signal that it is safe to freely express their prejudice.
disparagement humor appears to do just that by affecting people’s understanding of the social norms – implicit rules of acceptable conduct – in the immediate context. and in a variety of experiments, my colleagues and i have found support for this idea, which we call prejudiced norm theory.
for instance, in studies, men higher in hostile sexism – antagonism against women – reported greater tolerance of gender harassment in the workplace upon exposure to sexist versus neutral (nonsexist) jokes. men higher in hostile sexism also recommended greater funding cuts to a women’s organization at their university after watching sexist versus neutral comedy skits. even more disturbing, other researchers found that men higher in hostile sexism expressed greater willingness to rape a woman upon exposure to sexist versus nonsexist humor.

Accepted Answer

Since no specific question is provided about this content, it's hard to give a targeted answer. If you want to analyze the psychological aspects (related to the "prejudiced norm theory" and how humor affects prejudice expression), or discuss the social implications of sitcom humor, or something else, please clarify your question (e.g., "Explain the prejudiced norm theory based on the text" or "Analyze how sexist jokes impact men's attitudes according to the text").

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Answer:

harm how?	quote	article
	but there is psychological research on humour that denigrates, belittles, or maligns an individual or social group that argues the opposite. this work has found that such jokes act “as a releaser of existing prejudice”	https://docs.google.com/document/d/19paerr6bvtnz7qjhpwqyjlnoxnvbhhtt7p2ibc4xq/edit?usp=sharing
	disparagement humor is paradoxical: it simultaneously communicates two conflicting messages.	https://theconversation.com/psychology-behind-the-unfunny-consequences-of-jokes-that-denigrate-63855