Question

jacob conducted an investigation to determine the effect of acid on different types of rocks. he found that the data he collected do not support his hypothesis. why would jacobs hypothesis still have some value? it shows that jacobs investigation could have been better planned. it demonstrates that jacob needs more practice investigating. it might encourage jacob to investigate the effect of bases instead. it might lead to the development of new investigations.

Explanation:

In science, a hypothesis that is not supported by data can still be valuable as it can inspire new research directions and investigations. It helps in the iterative process of scientific discovery.

Answer:

It might lead to the development of new investigations.