Question

keith is researching a controversial topic and wants to use a website he found as an information source. which of the following is a sign that the website is not a worthwhile resource? a. the author is a well - known expert on the topic. b. the author uses emotional language to express a single point of view c. the author supports claims with facts d. the author has no conflict of interest

Explanation:

To determine a non - worthwhile resource, we analyze each option:

• Option A: An author who is a well - known expert on the topic is more likely to provide reliable information, so this is a sign of a worthwhile resource.
• Option B: Using emotional language to express a single point of view suggests bias and a lack of objectivity. In research, especially on controversial topics, objectivity and a balanced presentation of different viewpoints (or at least a fact - based, non - emotionally charged presentation) are important. So this is a sign that the website is not a worthwhile resource.
• Option C: Supporting claims with facts is a characteristic of a reliable and worthwhile information source.
• Option D: An author with no conflict of interest is more likely to provide unbiased and reliable information, so this is a sign of a worthwhile resource.

Answer:

B. The author uses emotional language to express a single point of view