Question

listed below are amounts (in millions of dollars) collected from parking meters by a security company in a certain city. a larger data - set was used to convict 5 members of the company of grand larceny. find the mean and median for each of the two samples and then compare the two sets of results. do the limited data listed here show evidence of stealing by the security companys employees?
security company: 12 14 12 14 16 11 18 11 11 150
other companies: 18 22 19 16 19 17 22 16 16 21
compare the results. choose the correct answer below.
a. the mean and the median for the security company are both lower than the mean and the median for the collections performed by other companies.
b. the mean and the median for the collections performed by other companies are both lower than the mean and the median for the security company.
c. the mean is lower for the security company, but the median is lower for the collections performed by other companies.
d. the mean and median appear to be roughly the same for all collections.
e. the median is lower for the collections performed by other companies, but the mean is lower for the security company.
do the limited data listed here show evidence of stealing by the security companys employees?
a. since the security company appears to have collected lower revenue than the other companies, there is some evidence of stealing by the security companys employees.
b. the sample size is not large enough to show any meaningful results.
c. since the data is not matched, there is no evidence of stealing by the security companys employees.
d. since the security company does not appear to have collected lower revenue than the other companies, there is no evidence of stealing by the security companys employees.

Explanation:

Step1: Calculate mean for security company

The data for security company is \(12,14,12,14,16,11,18,11,11,15\). Mean \(\bar{x}_1=\frac{12 + 14+12+14+16+11+18+11+11+15}{10}=\frac{135}{10}=13.5\).

Step2: Arrange security - company data for median

Arrange the data in ascending order: \(11,11,11,12,12,14,14,15,16,18\). Since \(n = 10\) (even), median \(M_1=\frac{12 + 14}{2}=13\).

Step3: Calculate mean for other companies

The data for other companies is \(18,22,19,16,19,17,22,16,16,21\). Mean \(\bar{x}_2=\frac{18+22+19+16+19+17+22+16+16+21}{10}=\frac{186}{10}=18.6\).

Step4: Arrange other - companies data for median

Arrange the data in ascending order: \(16,16,16,17,18,19,19,21,22,22\). Since \(n = 10\) (even), median \(M_2=\frac{18 + 19}{2}=18.5\).

Step5: Compare mean and median

We have \(\bar{x}_1 = 13.5<\bar{x}_2=18.6\) and \(M_1 = 13

Step6: Analyze for evidence of stealing

The security company has lower mean and median values for collections, which may suggest they collected less revenue, indicating some evidence of stealing.

Answer:

A. The mean and the median for the security company are both lower than the mean and the median for the collections performed by other companies.
A. Since the security company appears to have collected lower revenue than the other companies, there is some evidence of stealing by the security company's employees.