Question

mendez v. westminster
assigned by: jaclyn vazquez
due dec 16, 2025 11:59 pm
reading quiz
question 7
instructions
read the question carefully and select the best answer.
which of these inferences is best supported in paragraphs 11 and 12?
a. mccormicks ruling does not detail evidence of the negative consequences of school segregation, but instead solely focuses on the principle of the matter
b. california isnt responsible for understanding the constitution of the united states as it has no connection to state education policy or law.
c. segregation in the defendant school districts was limited only to beginning english language learners.
d. in addition to more effective english language instruction, desegregated schools promote shared american ideals and culture.

Explanation:

To solve this, we analyze each option:

• Option A: If the ruling focused solely on principle (not negative consequences of segregation), but we need to check Paragraphs 11 - 12. Without the text, but logically, a ruling on segregation (like in Mendez v. Westminster) would likely address both principle and harm. Eliminate A.
• Option B: The US Constitution does apply to state education (via 14th Amendment, etc.). So B is incorrect.
• Option C: Segregation in school districts (like in Mendez) was not limited to English learners—often it was broader (e.g., based on ethnicity). Eliminate C.
• Option D: Desegregated schools promote shared culture/ideals (a common theme in civil rights cases) and better English instruction. This aligns with the context of Mendez v. Westminster (fighting segregation for better education and unity).

Answer:

D. In addition to more effective English language instruction, desegregated schools promote shared American ideals and culture.