Question

multiple select question
select all that apply
during his speech, ari quoted article 1, section 9, of the u.s. constitution to his class without further explanation: the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it. no bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed. ari did not follow rules of good language in which two ways?
□ he used language with connotation.
□ he did not use words likely to be familiar to the audience.
□ he did not use language clearly.
□ he did not use language accurately.
need help? review these concept resources.

Explanation:

Ari quoted a formal, specialized constitutional clause without explanation. Legal/constitutional terms like "writ of habeas corpus," "bill of attainder," and "ex post facto law" are not familiar to most general audiences, so he used unfamiliar language. Additionally, he did not clarify the meaning of this technical content, so his language was not clear for the audience. The quote uses neutral, denotative legal language (no connotation), and there is no indication the quote itself was inaccurate.

Answer:

He did not use words likely to be familiar to the audience.
He did not use language clearly.