Question

3 nixons wife, pat, was sitting by him as he gave his speech and visible several times when he mentioned her or their family. what was the effect of nixon calling on his wife throughout the speech? claim: cite: clarify: 4 do you think that nixon was corrupted by his success with the checkers speech and the political power that it gave him? what, in your opinion, makes a speech persuasive versus manipulative? do you think that nixons speech was the former or the latter? claim: cite: clarify:

Explanation:

For question 3: Mentioning his wife throughout the speech likely humanized Nixon, making him seem more relatable and endearing to the audience, potentially enhancing his like - ability and the speech's emotional impact. For question 4: To determine if Nixon was corrupted by success, one would need to analyze his actions post - speech. A persuasive speech uses valid arguments and appeals to reason and emotion in an ethical way, while a manipulative one uses underhanded tactics to deceive or control. Whether Nixon's speech was persuasive or manipulative depends on an analysis of its content, such as the use of facts, emotional appeals, and the overall intent.

Answer:

Question 3:
Claim: Mentioning his wife made Nixon more relatable and enhanced the speech's emotional impact.
Cite: Based on the common understanding of how personal references in speeches can affect the audience.
Clarify: By bringing in a personal element, he connected with the audience on an emotional level.

Question 4:
Claim: Whether Nixon was corrupted depends on post - speech actions; a persuasive speech uses ethical appeals while a manipulative one uses underhanded tactics; the nature of Nixon's speech requires content analysis.
Cite: General knowledge of speech types and the concept of corruption in the context of political success.
Clarify: Analyzing the speech's facts, appeals, and intent is necessary to classify it as persuasive or manipulative.