Question

read this portion of tricia’s text: i understand that our city needs additional income. last year, two factories relocated to bigger cities, and this severely hurt residents and negatively impacted the city’s budget. based on the previous meeting records, this new ordinance could help make up for the lost money from the factory closures. however, there are other ways of bringing in more money to the city.
3
select the correct answer.
how could tricia have crafted a stronger refutation?
a. by providing statistics or data about losses due factory closures
b. by not mentioning the factory closures
c. by suggesting how to decrease city spending
d. by explicitly listing other ways of raising money

Explanation:

To craft a stronger refutation, using concrete statistics or data about losses from factory closures would add credibility and depth. Option B (not mentioning factory closures) weakens the argument. Option C (suggesting decreasing city spending) is off - topic as the focus is on raising income. Option D (explicitly listing other money - raising ways) doesn't directly refute the claim about the new ordinance making up for factory - closure losses; it just offers alternatives. Providing data on losses would better show if the new ordinance can truly compensate, thus strengthening the refutation.

Answer:

A. by providing statistics or data about losses due factory closures