Question

read the sample student claim and the reasons listed for making this claim. claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. reason #1: animal research has yielded both pain - relieving and life - saving drugs for humans. reason #2: laws prohibit scientists from using animal - based research in cases where non - animal testing would produce equally clear and valid results. which piece of evidence would best support reason #2? o animal research is extremely costly, so it is in the best financial interest of scientists to pursue other means of testing before deciding to utilize animals in their research. o with just 115 inspectors and over 7,500 facilities involved with the research, breeding, or handling of animals in some way, regulation of the animal welfare act is virtually impossible. o enacted in 1966, the animal welfare act is a us federal law that regulates the care and use of animals in a variety of circumstances, including medical research and testing. o people will not tolerate the suffering of animals, so it is only logical that scientists will only use animal testing as a last resort when all other measures

Explanation:

The claim is about the benefits of animal - based medical testing outweighing rights concerns. Reason #2 is about laws restricting animal - based research when non - animal testing is sufficient. The third option about the Animal Welfare Act being a federal law regulating animal use in medical research directly supports this reason as it shows the existence of relevant laws.

Answer:

Enacted in 1966, the Animal Welfare Act is a US federal law that regulates the care and use of animals in a variety of circumstances, including medical research and testing