Question

1.7 study: analyze rhetoric because of their different rhetorical situations, henrys work needed to be, while paines had to be positive and uplifting understandable to someone listening appealing to the general public free from passion and emotion

Explanation:

Rhetoric involves using language effectively. Henry might have been speaking in a more immediate, possibly passionate context like a speech to an audience, so his work needed to be understandable to someone listening. Paine often wrote for a broader - public audience to persuade them on political or social issues, so his work had to be appealing to the general public.

Answer:

Henry's work: understandable to someone listening
Paine's work: appealing to the general public