Question

the supreme court case known as kelo v. city of new london was controversial because it ______.
○ allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain
○ regulated popular ride - sharing services like lyft and uber
○ limited the application of the death penalty
○ made it harder for police to use evidence obtained without a warrant

Explanation:

Kelo v. City of New London was a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case centered on eminent domain. The court ruled that local governments could seize private property for economic development projects (a broader interpretation of "public use" under eminent domain), which sparked widespread controversy. The other options are unrelated: ride-sharing regulations are not tied to this case, it did not address the death penalty, and it had no connection to warrantless evidence rules.

Answer:

A. allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain