Question

teenagers and social media: the pros and cons of excessive screen time by: linh nguyen according to a recent study, teenagers are spending more time on social media than ever before. the study found that the average teenager spends up to 9 hours a day on social media platforms like instagram, tiktok, and snapchat. but what are the effects of this excessive screen time? child psychologist dr. maya patel advises that spending too much time on social media can lead to a range of negative consequences. it can contribute to feelings of loneliness, anxiety, and depression. additionally, social media can be a major source of cyberbullying, with one in three teens reporting being the victim of online harassment. however, not all news about social media and teenagers is negative. some experts suggest that social media can be a valuable tool for connecting with others and expressing oneself. when used in moderation, social media can help teenagers build relationships, discover new interests, and even develop important skills. so, what should teenagers do about social media? experts recommend setting limits on screen time, being mindful of the content they post and share, and taking breaks from social media when they start to feel overwhelmed or anxious. what could your advice about citing evidence be to a classmate who is using this article for a research paper? scan the article for keywords you can cite and underline them. this way, you can skip the parts that dont support your claim. scan the article for any facts and statistics and underline them because those are the most important pieces of evidence you can find.

Explanation:

To solve this, we analyze the options for citing evidence from the article:

Analyzing Option 1:

The article has both negative and positive aspects of social media on teenagers (e.g., negative: loneliness, anxiety; positive: connecting with others). Skipping parts that don't support a claim would lead to a biased citation, as research should consider all relevant evidence, not just what fits a claim. So this advice is flawed.

Analyzing Option 2:

The article includes facts and statistics (e.g., "the average teenager spends up to 9 hours a day", "one in three teens reporting being the victim of online harassment"). Facts and statistics are strong, objective pieces of evidence in research. Underlining these helps identify reliable, quantifiable or verifiable information to cite, which is crucial for a research paper.

Option 1 suggests skipping parts that don't support a claim, leading to bias. Option 2 focuses on facts/statistics, which are strong, objective evidence. The article has stats (e.g., 9 hours, 1 in 3 teens) and facts, so underlining these is good advice.

Answer:

The correct option is: "Scan the article for any facts and statistics and underline them because those are the most important pieces of evidence you can find." (The second option, assuming the first option is A and the second is B: B. Scan the article for any facts and statistics and underline them because those are the most important pieces of evidence you can find.)