Question

the thesis statement below is... video game censorship is unnecessarily strict. debatable not defendable too obvious

Explanation:

A thesis statement is debatable if there are differing opinions on it. The statement "Video game censorship is unnecessarily strict" can be debated because some may argue that censorship is necessary for various reasons (e.g., protecting minors, maintaining social norms), while others may argue it is too strict and restricts creative freedom or adult choices. It is defendable with evidence (e.g., examples of over - censored games, impact on developers) and not too obvious as there isn't a universal agreement on the strictness of video game censorship.

Answer:

Debatable