Question

1. they tried murder of their eggs also ended up dying.
2. find one example where history or facts are changed. how does that make the animals feel or act?

Explanation:

A well-documented example is the case of honey bees and the misinformation surrounding neonicotinoid pesticides. Early industry framing minimized the link between these pesticides and bee colony collapse, distorting the scientific "fact history" of bee health threats. When corrected scientific evidence confirmed neonicotinoids harm bee navigation, foraging, and colony survival, bee conservation efforts shifted: beekeepers advocated for pesticide bans, and farmers adopted more bee-friendly practices. The corrected facts also led to increased public support for pollinator protection, changing how humans interact with and advocate for bees.

Answer:

Example: Honey bees and neonicotinoid pesticide misinformation.

• Changed "history/facts": Early industry claims denied neonicotinoids harmed bees, but scientific evidence later proved they disrupt bee navigation, foraging, and colony survival.
• Impact on animals: Bees faced massive colony collapse under false "safe" pesticide use; with corrected facts, reduced pesticide use helped stabilize some colonies, and targeted conservation efforts (like wildflower habitats) supported their foraging and survival behaviors.
• Impact on human behavior: Farmers shifted to alternative pesticides, policymakers restricted neonicotinoids, and the public supported pollinator protection initiatives, changing how humans interact with and protect bee populations.