Question

what evidence did the second speaker use to support his argument?
a. examples from nearby towns with parks
b. a study showing financial strain from park maintenance
c. testimonials from local residents
d. data on increased crime rates in parks

what makes evidence credible?
a. expert verification
b. personal stories
c. emotional appeal
d. popular opinions

what characterizes secondary sources?
a. general overview
b. analysis of original data
c. raw statistics
d. direct accounts

Explanation:

1. For the first question, without context we can't be sure, but a study is a common and reliable form of evidence. A study showing financial strain from park - maintenance is a likely choice.
2. Expert verification gives credibility to evidence as experts have knowledge and authority in their fields. Personal stories, emotional appeals, and popular opinions may be subjective.
3. Secondary sources typically provide a general overview. They summarize, analyze, or interpret primary sources and original data.

Answer:

1. b. A study showing financial strain from park maintenance
2. a. Expert verification
3. a. General overview