Question

what idea was the decision in griswold v connecticut based upon? if the constitution forbids self - incrimination, husbands and wives should not be forced to testify against each other. the constitution cannot possibly include all rights, so judges can create new ones based on what the founders must have been thinking. if the constitution forbids unreasonable searches, there must be a reasonable right to privacy. the constitution does not meet everyones needs, so citizens can disregard laws when they think the government is violating their rights.

Explanation:

The Griswold v Connecticut case established a right - to - privacy. The court inferred a right to privacy from other constitutional protections like the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches. It held that if the Constitution forbids unreasonable searches, there must be an underlying right to privacy.

Answer:

C. If the Constitution forbids unreasonable searches, there must be a reasonable right to privacy