Question

what is one limitation to how effective advocacy organizations can be in representing their members?
the limited amount of corporate involvement in lobbying
the overall decrease in the number of interest groups in dc.
the amount of resources required to influence policy

this is your first of 2 attempts

which tactic can individual members of advocacy groups use to improve the groups advocacy on behalf of all members?
eliminating free riders to address the collective action problem
partnering with groups that serve business and other economic interests
elevating the needs of their most marginalized group members

Explanation:

1. For the first question, influencing policy often requires significant resources like money, time, and staff. Limited resources can restrict an advocacy organization's ability to represent members effectively. Corporate involvement in lobbying is not a typical limitation for representing members, and there is no indication of an overall decrease in interest - groups in DC being a key limitation.
2. For the second question, free - riders can undermine group efforts. By eliminating free - riders, individual members can ensure that everyone is contributing to the group's advocacy, thus improving the group's overall effectiveness. Partnering with business - serving groups may not directly improve advocacy for all members of the original group, and while elevating the needs of marginalized members is important, it may not be the most direct way to improve advocacy on behalf of all members in the context of the collective action problem.

Answer:

1. the amount of resources required to influence policy
2. eliminating free riders to address the collective action problem