Question

which comparison best explains how the authors develop their claims in \the automation paradox\ and \humans vs. robots\?
in \the automation paradox,\ bostrom primarily uses anecdotes to show how computers have replaced the workforce. in \humans vs. robots,\ atkinson primarily uses graphs and charts to show how computers have benefited workers.
in \the automation paradox,\ bostrom primarily uses graphs and charts to show how computers have not changed employment levels. in \humans vs. robots,\ atkinson primarily uses anecdotes to show how computers have increased workforce.
in \the automation paradox,\ bostrom primarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased blue - collar jobs. in \humans vs. robots,\ atkinson primarily uses anecdotes to show how computers have lowered low - skill employment in many professions.
in \the automation paradox,\ bostrom primarily uses examples to show how computers have improved the workforce. in \humans vs. robots,\ atkinson primarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased employment in many professions.
which of the following is a synonym of relevant?
insignificant
important
expensive
unrelated

Explanation:

1. Analyze the first question about the authors' use of evidence in texts. We need to understand the content of the two texts to determine the correct answer.
2. For the second question about the synonym of "relevant", we consider the meaning of the word. "Relevant" means having a connection with the matter at hand. "Insignificant" means not important, "expensive" is about cost, "unrelated" is the opposite. "Important" can be a synonym as relevant things are often important in a context.

Answer:

1. No correct - answer provided in options as we don't have the full text content to determine which option about authors' evidence use is correct.
2. B. Important