Question

which detail best supports the idea that ethics bowl differs from traditional debate? (2 points)
○ judges come from university philosophy departments
● teams ask questions to expand discussion rather than refute opponents
○ teams compete for a trophy at the end of the event
○ students are given limited preparation time before responding
which statement best describes the tone of the article? 2 nores 1

Explanation:

To determine which detail supports that Ethics Bowl differs from traditional debate, we analyze each option:

• "Judges come from university philosophy departments": This relates to judges' origin, not the debate format difference.
• "Teams ask questions to expand discussion rather than refute opponents": Traditional debates often involve refuting opponents, while this shows Ethics Bowl focuses on expanding discussion, highlighting a format difference.
• "Teams compete for a trophy at the end of the event": Trophy competition is common in many events, not unique to distinguishing from traditional debate.
• "Students are given limited preparation time before responding": Preparation time doesn't uniquely distinguish from traditional debate.

So the option about teams asking questions to expand discussion (instead of refuting) best supports the idea of Ethics Bowl differing from traditional debate.

Answer:

Teams ask questions to expand discussion rather than refute opponents