Question

which footnote is formatted correctly?
²for an account of
the criticisms king
faced for cutting the
march short and not
sharing his plan with
others in the
movement, see
garrow, 403–04.

1. for a detailed

account of the
criticisms king faced
for ending the
march, see garrow
403–04.
²garrow 403–04
tells readers how
king knew at the
start of the second
attempt that he
would cut the march
short, but did not
inform most of the
marchers or even all
of the leaders of his
plan, which led
many in the
movement to briefly
criticize king.

1. see garrow 403–

04 for criticisms of
king for cutting the
march short

Explanation:

Footnotes typically use superscript numbers (or numbered lists for some styles) and provide concise references or explanations. The second box (2. For a detailed account of the criticisms King faced for ending the march, see Garrow 403–04) follows a clear footnote structure: it's numbered, gives context, and properly cites the source. The first uses superscript but has a comma after "Garrow" which is non - standard in many citation styles. The third mixes superscript with a lengthy explanatory text (footnotes are usually concise references, not extended explanations). The fourth is too brief and lacks context.

Answer:

1. For a detailed account of the criticisms King faced for ending the march, see Garrow 403–04.