Question

analyzing the effectiveness of the evidence
read the passage, then answer the question that follows. why is chamberlains argument effective? check all that apply.
it has had a hard life of it, this feeling of imperial patriotism. it was checked for a generation by the apathy and the indifference which were the characteristics of our former relations with our colonies, but it was never extinguished. the embers were still alight, and when in the late war this old country of ours showed that it was still possessed by the spirit of our ancestors, and that it was still prepared to count no sacrifice that was necessary in order to maintain the honor and the interests of the empire, then you found a response from your children across the seas that astonished the whole world by a proof, an undeniable proof, of affection and regard.
–\i believe in a british empire,\ joseph chamberlain
he makes a concession about imperialism, showing both sides of the argument.
he uses an appeal to emotion with words like honor and sacrifice to stir nationalism.
he uses an appeal to logic by comparing imperialism to a glowing fire.
he cites statistics to support his claim.
he cites evidence of winning the recent war to show that people still sacrifice for the empire.

Explanation:

1. Chamberlain acknowledges past apathy regarding imperialism, presenting both sides.
2. Words like "honor" and "sacrifice" evoke emotions and nationalism.
3. There is no comparison of imperialism to a glowing - fire as an appeal to logic in a typical sense.
4. No statistics are cited.
5. He refers to the recent war as evidence of people's sacrifice for the empire.

Answer:

He makes a concession about imperialism, showing both sides of the argument.
He uses an appeal to emotion with words like honor and sacrifice to stir nationalism.
He cites evidence of winning the recent war to show that people still sacrifice for the empire.