Question

choose the correct word to complete the paragraph.susan b. anthonys campaign speech holds significant importance as a powerful advocacy tool for womens suffrage.anthony adopted the stance that women had already been granted the inalienable right to vote as citizens. she directly addresses her audience by speaking in the second person, effectively engaging them in the cause. through her appeals to ethos, anthony makes compelling arguments grounded in legal language, emphasizing the inherent rights of gender and the principles of democracy.by weaving together persuasive quotes from influential figures like benjamin franklin and thomas paine, anthony bolsters her credibility to her cause. she urges women in her audience to exercise their rights as citizens under the law. overall, anthonys campaign speech exemplifies effective narrative writing by skillfully combining legal reasoning and historical context to appeal to select... and mobilize support for the crucial cause of womens suffrage.

Explanation:

1. The first blank refers to Anthony's core position on women's voting rights; "persuasive" does not fit the meaning of "stance" here, the correct term is persuasive is incorrect, the right fit for the stance of inherent voting rights is that women are citizens (since rights apply to citizens).
2. Anthony directly addresses her audience using second person (using "you" to speak directly to listeners).
3. Appeals to ethos rely on credibility, which matches her use of legal language and authoritative sources to build trust in her argument.
4. She emphasizes the inherent rights of citizens (not gender, as rights are tied to citizenship status in this context).
5. Citing influential figures like Franklin and Paine bolsters her credibility (a key part of ethos, which supports her persuasive appeal).
6. Her speech is a persuasive narrative, as its goal is to convince others to support women's suffrage.
7. She combines legal reasoning (from earlier mentions of legal language) with historical context.
8. She uses these elements to appeal to logic (alongside credibility) to mobilize support, as legal and historical context provide logical backing for her cause.

Answer:

1. Anthony adopted the persuasive stance that women had already been granted the inalienable right to vote as citizens.
2. She directly addresses her audience by speaking in the second person, effectively engaging them in the cause.
3. Through her appeals to ethos, Anthony makes compelling arguments grounded in legal language, emphasizing the inherent rights of citizens and the principles of democracy.
4. By weaving together her notes from influential figures like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine, Anthony bolsters her credibility to her cause.
5. She urges women in her audience to exercise their rights as citizens under the law. Overall, Anthony's campaign speech exemplifies effective persuasive writing by skillfully combining legal reasoning and historical context to appeal to logic and mobilize support for the crucial cause of women's suffrage.