Question

compare the interview \on the front lines with thurgood marshall\ with the informational piece \equal justice under law: thurgood marshall\. what key information is expanded on in the interview that is not deeply explored in the informational piece? the interview includes marshalls own struggle to get into law school which fueled his sense of injustice. the interview gives more specific examples of how segregation in education is inherently unequal and unfair. the interview provides a more detailed account of the supreme courts opinion on brown v. board of education. the interview mentioned more about the opposition marshall faced in the african american community.

Explanation:

Informational pieces like "Equal Justice Under Law: Thurgood Marshall" typically focus on public career highlights and landmark cases, while first-person interviews often add personal, lived experiences. Thurgood Marshall's personal struggle to access law school is a personal anecdote that would be expanded on in an interview, as it reveals his direct encounter with injustice that shaped his work, rather than just the broader legal or public details covered in a standard informational text. The other options focus on legal details or public context that are more likely to be covered in an informational piece about his career.

Answer:

The interview includes Marshall's own struggle to get into law school which fueled his sense of injustice.