QUESTION IMAGE
Question
compare the student text with the source.
source: jim kershner, \chief spokane garry (ca. 1811-1892).\ published on historylink.org, aug. 2008.
chief spokane garry was a chief of the spokane tribe whose long and ultimately tragic life spanned the fur-trading, missionary, and white settlement eras of the region.
student text:
over the course of his long life, chief spokane garry endured the comings and goings of fur traders, missionaries, and others who meant to settle permanently in the region occupied by his spokane tribe.
is the student text plagiarized?
Plagiarism involves using someone else's work or ideas without proper attribution, either by copying text or paraphrasing too closely without citation. Here, the student text rephrases the source's idea about Chief Spokane Garry's life spanning different eras (fur - trading, missionary, white settlement) as enduring the comings of fur traders, missionaries, and settlers. However, there's no citation to the source, and the rephrasing is a close restatement of the source's content. But to be precise, if we consider that the student has re - expressed the core idea without proper citation, but in terms of direct text copying, the student didn't copy the exact words. Wait, no—plagiarism can also be in the form of paraphrasing without attribution. The source says his life "spanned the fur - trading, missionary, and white settlement eras", and the student says he "endured the comings and goings of fur traders, missionaries, and others who meant to settle permanently". The ideas are very similar, and without citing the source, this could be considered plagiarism (specifically, paraphrasing plagiarism). But if we are only looking at direct word - for - word copying, the student didn't copy the exact text. But in academic integrity, paraphrasing without attribution is also plagiarism. However, maybe the question is about direct plagiarism (copying text). Let's check the text: the source's sentence structure and wording are different from the student's. The source: "Chief Spokane Garry was a chief of the Spokane Tribe whose long and ultimately tragic life spanned the fur - trading, missionary, and white settlement eras of the region." The student: "Over the course of his long life, Chief Spokane Garry endured the comings and goings of fur traders, missionaries, and others who meant to settle permanently in the region occupied by his Spokane Tribe." The student has rephrased the content, using different words but conveying the same core idea about his life and the different groups/eras. But since there's no citation, and the idea is taken from the source, but the wording is different. Wait, maybe the answer is no, because the student has rephrased the content rather than directly copying it. But in academic terms, even rephrasing without attribution can be considered plagiarism. But maybe the question is about direct text plagiarism. Let's check the words: the source has "spanned the fur - trading, missionary, and white settlement eras", student has "endured the comings and goings of fur traders, missionaries, and others who meant to settle permanently". The structure and words are different. So if we define plagiarism as direct copying of text, then the student text is not plagiarized (because they rephrased). But if we consider paraphrasing without attribution as plagiarism, then it is. But maybe the intended answer here is no, because the student didn't copy the exact text, just rephrased the idea. Wait, no—plagiarism includes both direct copying and improper paraphrasing. But perhaps in this context, since the student has changed the wording significantly (from "spanned... eras" to "endured the comings..."), and there's no direct text copying, the answer is no. Wait, let's re - examine: the source's key points are Chief Spokane Garry, his long life, spanning fur - trading, missionary, white settlement eras. The student's key points are Chief Spokane Garry, his long life, enduring fur traders, missionaries, settlers. So the idea is similar, but the wording is different. So if the question is about direct plagiarism (copying sentences/words),…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
No, the student text is not plagiarized. The student has rephrased the information from the source using different wording to convey a similar idea about Chief Spokane Garry's experiences during different eras, rather than directly copying the source's text.