Question

1. in the context of the text, what is more important: freedom or security? what did the united states value more in this situation? what did different individuals in cuba value? do you think that the us values freedom at home and security elsewhere? 4. in the context of the text, how do people create change? how was castro able to rise to power in cuba? how does the article suggest that the cia helped with this? cite evidence from this text, your own experience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer.

Explanation:

1. The importance of freedom vs security is a complex social - political question. Different people and nations have varying priorities. In the US, the stance on freedom at home and security abroad can be influenced by political ideology and foreign policy goals. Cubans' values would be shaped by their historical, social and political context.
2. People create change through various means such as social movements, political activism, and ideological shifts. Castro rose to power in Cuba through a combination of revolutionary activities, popular support against the Batista regime. If the article suggests CIA involvement, evidence would need to be specific references within the text, and real - world knowledge can be used to support or refute such a claim.

Answer:

1. There is no one - size - fits - all answer as values vary among individuals and nations. The US has a complex stance on freedom and security, and Cubans' values are context - dependent.
2. People create change via multiple methods. Castro rose to power through revolutionary efforts. Evidence for CIA involvement should be cited from the text and other sources.