directions: review the pros and cons of the dapl and then construct a paragraph to the oil company on a course of action. the pros and cons are from the following website https://www.procon.org/headlines/dakota - access - pipeline - top - 3 - pros - and - cons/ summarize the arguments on this page and the next.
arguments for the dapl or pro summarize the argument
construction of the dakota access pipeline will help the economy and create thousands of jobs.
building the pipeline is expected to create 8,000 to 12,000 new jobs and pump money into industries that manufacture steel pipes and other related materials. a georgetown professor estimated that construction will add $129 million in annual tax revenue into local and state economies during construction. once the pipeline is operational, north dakota, south dakota, iowa, and illinois may earn $50 million annually in property taxes and $74 million in sales taxes. the increased revenue would improve schools, roads, and emergency services in those areas. moving oil by pipeline instead of railroad will ease transportation shortages for other major regional industries including agriculture.
construction of the dakota access pipeline will help the united states to become more energy independent.
there are 2.5 million miles of oil and gas pipelines currently running through the united states. reducing oil imports from the middle east, russia, and elsewhere lowers us dependence on foreign energy, which in turn bolsters national security and creates leverage to push for human rights improvements in oil - producing nations. oil imports account for nearly two - thirds of the us annual trade deficit, but north dakotas 251% increase in oil production since 2010 can significantly cut back on the billions of dollars leaving the us economy. president obama spoke about increased domestic oil production in his 2013 state of the union speech, saying, \after years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future.\ the pipeline is considered a big step in that direction.
the dakota access pipeline will make transporting oil from north dakota to major refining markets safer, more cost effective, and more environmentally friendly.
a review of us department of transportation statistics proved that \pipelines result in fewer spillage incidents and personal injuries than road and rail,\ according to the manhattan institute. transferring oil by pipeline is less likely to result in spills or accidents, avoiding incidents like the may 2015 derailment of a train carrying crude oil that resulted in a fiery crash and forced the evacuation of a north dakota town. kelcy warren, ceo of the company building the dapl, told pbs newshour, his pipeline is being built to safety standards that far exceed what the

Question

directions: review the pros and cons of the dapl and then construct a paragraph to the oil company on a course of action. the pros and cons are from the following website https://www.procon.org/headlines/dakota - access - pipeline - top - 3 - pros - and - cons/ summarize the arguments on this page and the next.
arguments for the dapl or pro	summarize the argument
construction of the dakota access pipeline will help the economy and create thousands of jobs.
building the pipeline is expected to create 8,000 to 12,000 new jobs and pump money into industries that manufacture steel pipes and other related materials. a georgetown professor estimated that construction will add $129 million in annual tax revenue into local and state economies during construction. once the pipeline is operational, north dakota, south dakota, iowa, and illinois may earn $50 million annually in property taxes and $74 million in sales taxes. the increased revenue would improve schools, roads, and emergency services in those areas. moving oil by pipeline instead of railroad will ease transportation shortages for other major regional industries including agriculture.
construction of the dakota access pipeline will help the united states to become more energy independent.
there are 2.5 million miles of oil and gas pipelines currently running through the united states. reducing oil imports from the middle east, russia, and elsewhere lowers us dependence on foreign energy, which in turn bolsters national security and creates leverage to push for human rights improvements in oil - producing nations. oil imports account for nearly two - thirds of the us annual trade deficit, but north dakotas 251% increase in oil production since 2010 can significantly cut back on the billions of dollars leaving the us economy. president obama spoke about increased domestic oil production in his 2013 state of the union speech, saying, \after years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future.\ the pipeline is considered a big step in that direction.
the dakota access pipeline will make transporting oil from north dakota to major refining markets safer, more cost effective, and more environmentally friendly.
a review of us department of transportation statistics proved that \pipelines result in fewer spillage incidents and personal injuries than road and rail,\ according to the manhattan institute. transferring oil by pipeline is less likely to result in spills or accidents, avoiding incidents like the may 2015 derailment of a train carrying crude oil that resulted in a fiery crash and forced the evacuation of a north dakota town. kelcy warren, ceo of the company building the dapl, told pbs newshour, 	his pipeline is being built to safety standards that far exceed what the

Accepted Answer

# Brief Explanations:
The text presents three main pro - arguments for the Dakota Access Pipeline. Firstly, it claims the pipeline will boost the economy by creating jobs (8,000 - 12,000 during construction), increasing tax revenues for local and state economies. Secondly, it will enhance US energy independence by reducing foreign oil imports, which also has implications for national security and trade deficit reduction. Thirdly, it will make oil transportation safer, more cost - effective, and more environmentally friendly compared to rail and road transport.
# Answer:
The pro - arguments for the Dakota Access Pipeline are: 1. Economic boost through job creation and increased tax revenues. 2. Enhancement of US energy independence, national security, and trade deficit reduction. 3. Safer, more cost - effective, and more environmentally friendly oil transportation.

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Answer: