Question

how do passages 1 and 2 use the same evidence to develop opposing arguments about whether love is cultural or biological?

passage 1 argues that romantic love has remained the same, while culture changes, to prove that love is biological. passage 2 argues that romantic love has changed over time as music has, to prove that it is cultural.
passage 1 argues that the definition of love proves that it is a definitive concept. passage 2 argues that love cannot be clearly defined and therefore is not a biological concept that can be measured.
passage 1 uses mri scans to show that stimulus produced by the brain proves that love is a biological concept. passage 2 uses mri scans to show that the same area of the brain produces both feelings of love and disgust to prove it is not biological.
passage 1 uses the ancient presence of romantic love in literature to show that it is biological. passage 2 uses the ancient presence of romantic love in literature to show that it was only present as a necessity for survival.

Explanation:

We need to identify the option where both passages use the same evidence to make opposing arguments about love being biological or cultural.

• The first option uses different evidence (stability vs. change with music).
• The second option focuses on definition, not shared evidence.
• The third option uses the same MRI scan evidence: Passage 1 uses it to link brain activity to biological love, while Passage 2 uses the same brain area activation for love and disgust to argue against a biological basis.
• The fourth option uses ancient literature, but Passage 2's framing of it as a survival necessity does not directly oppose the biological claim using the same core evidence in a conflicting way as the MRI option.

Answer:

Passage 1 uses MRI scans to show that stimulus produced by the brain proves that love is a biological concept. Passage 2 uses MRI scans to show that the same area of the brain produces both feelings of love and disgust to prove it is not biological.