Question

inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it:
a. includes support from unreliable experts to make a point.
b. counts on the emotions of the audience to come to a decision.
c. comes to a general conclusion based on a specific observation.
d. begins with a big idea that is supported with specifics.

Explanation:

Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions. Since the conclusion goes beyond the given specific evidence, it can only be probabilistic, not logically certain, making it weaker than deductive reasoning (which moves from general truths to specific, logically necessary conclusions). Option A refers to appeal to unqualified authority, not inductive reasoning. Option B refers to emotional appeals, not inductive reasoning. Option D describes deductive reasoning.

Answer:

C. comes to a general conclusion based on a specific observation.