Question

lisa is 800 meters from the base of a mountain, as shown. from where she stands, she measures the angle of elevation to the peak of the mountain to be 38°. she then walks to the nearest part of the base of the mountain. lisa measures the new angle of elevation, this time getting 49°. image of triangle with peak, lisa, base of mountain, 800 m, 38°, 49° how far is lisa from the peak of the mountain when she is standing at its base? do not round during your calculations. round your final answer to the nearest hundred meters.
blank m

Explanation:

Step1: Find the height of the mountain (h)

Let the height of the mountain be \( h \). When Lisa is 800 meters from the base, the angle of elevation is \( 38^\circ \), so \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800 + x} \) (where \( x \) is the distance from the base to the nearest point, but actually when she is at the base, we can first find \( h \) using the first triangle. Wait, actually, let's correct: when she is 800m from the base, angle of elevation is \( 38^\circ \), so \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800 + d} \)? No, wait the diagram: the first position is 800m from the base's near point? Wait no, the problem says: Lisa is 800 meters from the base of a mountain. Then she walks to the nearest part of the base. So initially, distance from Lisa to base (near point) is 800m, angle of elevation \( 38^\circ \). Then at the base (near point), angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \). So let's denote:

Let \( h \) be the height of the mountain, \( d \) be the distance from Lisa (at base) to peak (so we need to find \( d \)). At the base, angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \), so \( \sin(49^\circ)=\frac{h}{d} \), so \( h = d\sin(49^\circ) \).

Initially, Lisa is 800m from the base, angle of elevation \( 38^\circ \), so \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800} \)? Wait no, the horizontal distance from Lisa's first position to the base is 800m? Wait the diagram: Lisa is at a point, 800m from the base (near point), then the line from Lisa to peak makes \( 38^\circ \) with horizontal, and from base (near point) to peak makes \( 49^\circ \) with horizontal. So the two triangles: one with angle \( 38^\circ \), adjacent side 800m, opposite side \( h \); and one with angle \( 49^\circ \), adjacent side 0 (wait no, at the base, the horizontal distance is 0, so the distance from base to peak is the hypotenuse \( d \), so \( \sin(49^\circ)=\frac{h}{d} \), and \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800} \). So we can set \( h = 800\tan(38^\circ) \), then \( d=\frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)}=\frac{800\tan(38^\circ)}{\sin(49^\circ)} \).

Step2: Calculate \( \tan(38^\circ) \) and \( \sin(49^\circ) \)

\( \tan(38^\circ) \approx 0.7813 \), \( \sin(49^\circ) \approx 0.7547 \)

Step3: Compute \( h \) first

\( h = 800 \times 0.7813 = 625.04 \)

Step4: Compute \( d \)

\( d=\frac{625.04}{0.7547} \approx 828.2 \)

Wait, but let's do it more accurately without rounding intermediate steps.

\( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{\sin(38^\circ)}{\cos(38^\circ)} \), so \( h = 800 \times \frac{\sin(38^\circ)}{\cos(38^\circ)} \)

Then \( d=\frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} = \frac{800 \times \sin(38^\circ)}{\cos(38^\circ) \times \sin(49^\circ)} \)

Calculate \( \sin(38^\circ) \approx 0.6157 \), \( \cos(38^\circ) \approx 0.7880 \), \( \sin(49^\circ) \approx 0.7547 \)

So \( d = \frac{800 \times 0.6157}{0.7880 \times 0.7547} = \frac{492.56}{0.5947} \approx 828.2 \)

Wait, but maybe I made a mistake in the diagram. Wait the problem says "how far is Lisa from the peak when she is standing at its base". So at the base, the distance from Lisa to peak is the hypotenuse of the right triangle with height \( h \) and angle \( 49^\circ \). But we can also use the Law of Sines in the triangle formed by Lisa's two positions and the peak.

Let’s denote:

- Point A: Lisa's first position (800m from base)
- Point B: Base (near point)
- Point P: Peak

So triangle ABP: AB = 800m, angle at A is \( 38^\circ \), angle at B is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? Wait no, angle at B: when at B, angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the horizontal is \( 49^\circ \), and the angle between AP and the horizontal is \( 38^\circ \), so the angle at A between AB and AP is \( 38^\circ \), and the angle at B between AB and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? Wait no, the triangle ABP: angle at A is \( 38^\circ \), angle at B is \( 180^\circ - 38^\circ - \angle APB \). Wait, the angle at P: \( \angle APB = 49^\circ - 38^\circ = 11^\circ \)? Wait no, let's use Law of Sines.

In triangle ABP:

- AB = 800m
- Angle at A: \( 38^\circ \)
- Angle at B: \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that can't be. Wait, the height \( h \) is the same, so \( h = AB_1 \tan(38^\circ) = BB_1 \tan(49^\circ) \), but AB is 800m, so \( AB_1 = 800 + BB_1 \)? No, maybe better to use Law of Sines.

Wait, the two right triangles:

1. From A (800m from B) to P: right triangle with angle \( 38^\circ \), adjacent side \( x = 800 + y \) (where y is distance from B to the point below P), opposite side \( h \). So \( \tan(38^\circ) = \frac{h}{x} \)

2. From B to P: right triangle with angle \( 49^\circ \), adjacent side \( y \), opposite side \( h \). So \( \tan(49^\circ) = \frac{h}{y} \)

So \( h = (800 + y)\tan(38^\circ) = y\tan(49^\circ) \)

So \( 800\tan(38^\circ) + y\tan(38^\circ) = y\tan(49^\circ) \)

\( 800\tan(38^\circ) = y(\tan(49^\circ) - \tan(38^\circ)) \)

\( y = \frac{800\tan(38^\circ)}{\tan(49^\circ) - \tan(38^\circ)} \)

Then, the distance from B to P (which is what we need) is \( \frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} \), but \( h = y\tan(49^\circ) \), so distance \( d = \frac{y\tan(49^\circ)}{\sin(49^\circ)} = \frac{y}{\cos(49^\circ)} \)

Alternatively, since in the right triangle at B, \( d = \frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} \), and \( h = (800 + y)\tan(38^\circ) \), but maybe easier to use the first method.

Wait, let's compute \( h \) from the first position: \( h = 800 \times \tan(38^\circ) \)

Then, at the base, \( \sin(49^\circ) = \frac{h}{d} \), so \( d = \frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} = \frac{800 \times \tan(38^\circ)}{\sin(49^\circ)} \)

Calculate \( \tan(38^\circ) \approx 0.7812856265 \), \( \sin(49^\circ) \approx 0.7547095802 \)

So \( d = \frac{800 \times 0.7812856265}{0.7547095802} = \frac{625.0285012}{0.7547095802} \approx 828.2 \)

Rounding to the nearest hundred meters: 800? Wait no, 828.2 is closer to 800 or 900? 828 is 800 + 28, so nearest hundred is 800? Wait no, 828 is 8.28 hundred, so nearest hundred is 800? Wait no, 828 is 800 when rounded to nearest hundred? Wait 828 is between 800 and 900, 28 away from 800, 72 away from 900, so yes, 800? Wait but my calculation was 828, maybe I made a mistake.

Wait let's recalculate with more precise values:

\( \tan(38^\circ) = \tan(38) \approx 0.7812856265 \)

\( 800 \times 0.7812856265 = 625.0285012 \)

\( \sin(49^\circ) = \sin(49) \approx 0.7547095802 \)

\( 625.0285012 / 0.7547095802 ≈ 828.17 \)

So 828.17, rounded to nearest hundred is 800? Wait no, 828 is 8.28 hundreds, so the nearest hundred is 800? Wait 828 is 800 + 28, so yes, 800? Wait but maybe my approach is wrong.

Wait another approach: use Law of Sines in triangle ABP, where A is Lisa's first position, B is base, P is peak.

Angle at A: \( 38^\circ \)

Angle at B: \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that's not right. Wait, the angle between BA and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, the angle of elevation at B is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the horizontal (which is BA extended) is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BA and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \). The angle at A is \( 38^\circ \) (between BA and AP). So angle at P is \( 180^\circ - 38^\circ - 131^\circ = 11^\circ \)

Then by Law of Sines: \( \frac{AB}{\sin(11^\circ)} = \frac{BP}{\sin(38^\circ)} \)

AB is 800m, so \( BP = \frac{800 \times \sin(38^\circ)}{\sin(11^\circ)} \)

Calculate \( \sin(38^\circ) \approx 0.6156614753 \), \( \sin(11^\circ) \approx 0.1908089953 \)

So \( BP = \frac{800 \times 0.6156614753}{0.1908089953} = \frac{492.5291802}{0.1908089953} \approx 2581.3 \)

Wait, that's way different. So I must have messed up the triangle.

Ah! Here's the mistake: the angle at B is not \( 131^\circ \). The angle of elevation at B is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the vertical? No, angle of elevation is from horizontal to BP, so the angle between BP and the horizontal (BA) is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BA (horizontal) and BP is \( 49^\circ \), and the angle at A is \( 38^\circ \) (between BA and AP). So the triangle ABP has angles: at A: \( 38^\circ \), at B: \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that can't be, because the sum would be more than 180. Wait, no, the two lines AP and BP meet at P, so the triangle is A (Lisa's first position), B (base), P (peak). So BA is 800m (horizontal), AP is the line from A to P (angle of elevation \( 38^\circ \)), BP is the line from B to P (angle of elevation \( 49^\circ \)). So the angle at A is \( 38^\circ \), the angle at B is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that's impossible. Wait, the angle between BA and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \), and the angle between BA and AP is \( 38^\circ \), so the angle at P is \( 180 - 38 - 131 = 11^\circ \). Then by Law of Sines, \( \frac{AB}{\sin(11^\circ)} = \frac{BP}{\sin(38^\circ)} \), so \( BP = \frac{800 \times \sin(38^\circ)}{\sin(11^\circ)} \)

Calculating:

\( \sin(38^\circ) ≈ 0.61566 \)

\( \sin(11^\circ) ≈ 0.19081 \)

\( BP ≈ \frac{800 \times 0.61566}{0.19081} ≈ \frac{492.528}{0.19081} ≈ 2581 \)

Wait, that's a big difference. So where is the mistake?

Ah! The angle of elevation at B is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the horizontal (BA) is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and BA is \( 49^\circ \), not \( 180 - 49 \). Wait, BA is from B to A, which is 800m to the left. So the angle at B between BA (left along horizontal) and BP (up to peak) is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, if you are at B, looking up at P, the angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between the horizontal (to the right, away from A) and BP is \( 49^\circ \). But BA is to the left (towards A), so the angle between BA (left) and BP (up to P) is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \). Then the angle at A is \( 38^\circ \) (between BA (right, from A to B) and AP (up to P)). So the triangle has angles: at A: \( 38^\circ \), at B: \( 131^\circ \), at P: \( 11^\circ \). Then Law of Sines applies.

But then why the first method gave a different result? Because in the first method, I assumed that the horizontal distance from A to the base of the mountain (the point below P) is 800m, but actually, the base of the mountain is a point, and Lisa is 800m from that point (B), so the horizontal distance from A to the point below P (let's call it C) is \( BC + AB = y + 800 \),

Answer:

Step1: Find the height of the mountain (h)

Let the height of the mountain be \( h \). When Lisa is 800 meters from the base, the angle of elevation is \( 38^\circ \), so \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800 + x} \) (where \( x \) is the distance from the base to the nearest point, but actually when she is at the base, we can first find \( h \) using the first triangle. Wait, actually, let's correct: when she is 800m from the base, angle of elevation is \( 38^\circ \), so \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800 + d} \)? No, wait the diagram: the first position is 800m from the base's near point? Wait no, the problem says: Lisa is 800 meters from the base of a mountain. Then she walks to the nearest part of the base. So initially, distance from Lisa to base (near point) is 800m, angle of elevation \( 38^\circ \). Then at the base (near point), angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \). So let's denote:

Let \( h \) be the height of the mountain, \( d \) be the distance from Lisa (at base) to peak (so we need to find \( d \)). At the base, angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \), so \( \sin(49^\circ)=\frac{h}{d} \), so \( h = d\sin(49^\circ) \).

Initially, Lisa is 800m from the base, angle of elevation \( 38^\circ \), so \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800} \)? Wait no, the horizontal distance from Lisa's first position to the base is 800m? Wait the diagram: Lisa is at a point, 800m from the base (near point), then the line from Lisa to peak makes \( 38^\circ \) with horizontal, and from base (near point) to peak makes \( 49^\circ \) with horizontal. So the two triangles: one with angle \( 38^\circ \), adjacent side 800m, opposite side \( h \); and one with angle \( 49^\circ \), adjacent side 0 (wait no, at the base, the horizontal distance is 0, so the distance from base to peak is the hypotenuse \( d \), so \( \sin(49^\circ)=\frac{h}{d} \), and \( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{h}{800} \). So we can set \( h = 800\tan(38^\circ) \), then \( d=\frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)}=\frac{800\tan(38^\circ)}{\sin(49^\circ)} \).

Step2: Calculate \( \tan(38^\circ) \) and \( \sin(49^\circ) \)

\( \tan(38^\circ) \approx 0.7813 \), \( \sin(49^\circ) \approx 0.7547 \)

Step3: Compute \( h \) first

\( h = 800 \times 0.7813 = 625.04 \)

Step4: Compute \( d \)

\( d=\frac{625.04}{0.7547} \approx 828.2 \)

Wait, but let's do it more accurately without rounding intermediate steps.

\( \tan(38^\circ)=\frac{\sin(38^\circ)}{\cos(38^\circ)} \), so \( h = 800 \times \frac{\sin(38^\circ)}{\cos(38^\circ)} \)

Then \( d=\frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} = \frac{800 \times \sin(38^\circ)}{\cos(38^\circ) \times \sin(49^\circ)} \)

Calculate \( \sin(38^\circ) \approx 0.6157 \), \( \cos(38^\circ) \approx 0.7880 \), \( \sin(49^\circ) \approx 0.7547 \)

So \( d = \frac{800 \times 0.6157}{0.7880 \times 0.7547} = \frac{492.56}{0.5947} \approx 828.2 \)

Wait, but maybe I made a mistake in the diagram. Wait the problem says "how far is Lisa from the peak when she is standing at its base". So at the base, the distance from Lisa to peak is the hypotenuse of the right triangle with height \( h \) and angle \( 49^\circ \). But we can also use the Law of Sines in the triangle formed by Lisa's two positions and the peak.

Let’s denote:

• Point A: Lisa's first position (800m from base)
• Point B: Base (near point)
• Point P: Peak

So triangle ABP: AB = 800m, angle at A is \( 38^\circ \), angle at B is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? Wait no, angle at B: when at B, angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the horizontal is \( 49^\circ \), and the angle between AP and the horizontal is \( 38^\circ \), so the angle at A between AB and AP is \( 38^\circ \), and the angle at B between AB and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? Wait no, the triangle ABP: angle at A is \( 38^\circ \), angle at B is \( 180^\circ - 38^\circ - \angle APB \). Wait, the angle at P: \( \angle APB = 49^\circ - 38^\circ = 11^\circ \)? Wait no, let's use Law of Sines.

In triangle ABP:

• AB = 800m
• Angle at A: \( 38^\circ \)
• Angle at B: \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that can't be. Wait, the height \( h \) is the same, so \( h = AB_1 \tan(38^\circ) = BB_1 \tan(49^\circ) \), but AB is 800m, so \( AB_1 = 800 + BB_1 \)? No, maybe better to use Law of Sines.

Wait, the two right triangles:

1. From A (800m from B) to P: right triangle with angle \( 38^\circ \), adjacent side \( x = 800 + y \) (where y is distance from B to the point below P), opposite side \( h \). So \( \tan(38^\circ) = \frac{h}{x} \)

1. From B to P: right triangle with angle \( 49^\circ \), adjacent side \( y \), opposite side \( h \). So \( \tan(49^\circ) = \frac{h}{y} \)

So \( h = (800 + y)\tan(38^\circ) = y\tan(49^\circ) \)

So \( 800\tan(38^\circ) + y\tan(38^\circ) = y\tan(49^\circ) \)

\( 800\tan(38^\circ) = y(\tan(49^\circ) - \tan(38^\circ)) \)

\( y = \frac{800\tan(38^\circ)}{\tan(49^\circ) - \tan(38^\circ)} \)

Then, the distance from B to P (which is what we need) is \( \frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} \), but \( h = y\tan(49^\circ) \), so distance \( d = \frac{y\tan(49^\circ)}{\sin(49^\circ)} = \frac{y}{\cos(49^\circ)} \)

Alternatively, since in the right triangle at B, \( d = \frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} \), and \( h = (800 + y)\tan(38^\circ) \), but maybe easier to use the first method.

Wait, let's compute \( h \) from the first position: \( h = 800 \times \tan(38^\circ) \)

Then, at the base, \( \sin(49^\circ) = \frac{h}{d} \), so \( d = \frac{h}{\sin(49^\circ)} = \frac{800 \times \tan(38^\circ)}{\sin(49^\circ)} \)

Calculate \( \tan(38^\circ) \approx 0.7812856265 \), \( \sin(49^\circ) \approx 0.7547095802 \)

So \( d = \frac{800 \times 0.7812856265}{0.7547095802} = \frac{625.0285012}{0.7547095802} \approx 828.2 \)

Rounding to the nearest hundred meters: 800? Wait no, 828.2 is closer to 800 or 900? 828 is 800 + 28, so nearest hundred is 800? Wait no, 828 is 8.28 hundred, so nearest hundred is 800? Wait no, 828 is 800 when rounded to nearest hundred? Wait 828 is between 800 and 900, 28 away from 800, 72 away from 900, so yes, 800? Wait but my calculation was 828, maybe I made a mistake.

Wait let's recalculate with more precise values:

\( \tan(38^\circ) = \tan(38) \approx 0.7812856265 \)

\( 800 \times 0.7812856265 = 625.0285012 \)

\( \sin(49^\circ) = \sin(49) \approx 0.7547095802 \)

\( 625.0285012 / 0.7547095802 ≈ 828.17 \)

So 828.17, rounded to nearest hundred is 800? Wait no, 828 is 8.28 hundreds, so the nearest hundred is 800? Wait 828 is 800 + 28, so yes, 800? Wait but maybe my approach is wrong.

Wait another approach: use Law of Sines in triangle ABP, where A is Lisa's first position, B is base, P is peak.

Angle at A: \( 38^\circ \)

Angle at B: \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that's not right. Wait, the angle between BA and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, the angle of elevation at B is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the horizontal (which is BA extended) is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BA and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \). The angle at A is \( 38^\circ \) (between BA and AP). So angle at P is \( 180^\circ - 38^\circ - 131^\circ = 11^\circ \)

Then by Law of Sines: \( \frac{AB}{\sin(11^\circ)} = \frac{BP}{\sin(38^\circ)} \)

AB is 800m, so \( BP = \frac{800 \times \sin(38^\circ)}{\sin(11^\circ)} \)

Calculate \( \sin(38^\circ) \approx 0.6156614753 \), \( \sin(11^\circ) \approx 0.1908089953 \)

So \( BP = \frac{800 \times 0.6156614753}{0.1908089953} = \frac{492.5291802}{0.1908089953} \approx 2581.3 \)

Wait, that's way different. So I must have messed up the triangle.

Ah! Here's the mistake: the angle at B is not \( 131^\circ \). The angle of elevation at B is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the vertical? No, angle of elevation is from horizontal to BP, so the angle between BP and the horizontal (BA) is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BA (horizontal) and BP is \( 49^\circ \), and the angle at A is \( 38^\circ \) (between BA and AP). So the triangle ABP has angles: at A: \( 38^\circ \), at B: \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that can't be, because the sum would be more than 180. Wait, no, the two lines AP and BP meet at P, so the triangle is A (Lisa's first position), B (base), P (peak). So BA is 800m (horizontal), AP is the line from A to P (angle of elevation \( 38^\circ \)), BP is the line from B to P (angle of elevation \( 49^\circ \)). So the angle at A is \( 38^\circ \), the angle at B is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, that's impossible. Wait, the angle between BA and BP is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \), and the angle between BA and AP is \( 38^\circ \), so the angle at P is \( 180 - 38 - 131 = 11^\circ \). Then by Law of Sines, \( \frac{AB}{\sin(11^\circ)} = \frac{BP}{\sin(38^\circ)} \), so \( BP = \frac{800 \times \sin(38^\circ)}{\sin(11^\circ)} \)

Calculating:

\( \sin(38^\circ) ≈ 0.61566 \)

\( \sin(11^\circ) ≈ 0.19081 \)

\( BP ≈ \frac{800 \times 0.61566}{0.19081} ≈ \frac{492.528}{0.19081} ≈ 2581 \)

Wait, that's a big difference. So where is the mistake?

Ah! The angle of elevation at B is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and the horizontal (BA) is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between BP and BA is \( 49^\circ \), not \( 180 - 49 \). Wait, BA is from B to A, which is 800m to the left. So the angle at B between BA (left along horizontal) and BP (up to peak) is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \)? No, if you are at B, looking up at P, the angle of elevation is \( 49^\circ \), so the angle between the horizontal (to the right, away from A) and BP is \( 49^\circ \). But BA is to the left (towards A), so the angle between BA (left) and BP (up to P) is \( 180^\circ - 49^\circ = 131^\circ \). Then the angle at A is \( 38^\circ \) (between BA (right, from A to B) and AP (up to P)). So the triangle has angles: at A: \( 38^\circ \), at B: \( 131^\circ \), at P: \( 11^\circ \). Then Law of Sines applies.

But then why the first method gave a different result? Because in the first method, I assumed that the horizontal distance from A to the base of the mountain (the point below P) is 800m, but actually, the base of the mountain is a point, and Lisa is 800m from that point (B), so the horizontal distance from A to the point below P (let's call it C) is \( BC + AB = y + 800 \),