Question

no matter the subject area, when you are trying to determine if a source (in this case a person) is reputable, it is important to examine that persons credentials. what is their education level? in which area? does it qualify them as a legitimate source for information on a particular subject? biology is actually a fairly broad area of science with many subdisciplines. just because someone has a phd does not make them a legitimate source of information for all things biology, or science for that matter. which of these scientists would serve as better sources of information if you were researching vaccines? correct answer(s) dr. anthony fauci, ba in classics, doctor of medicine from cornell university of medicine, directs the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases dr. sarah gilbert, ba in biological sciences, phd in genetics and biochemistry from university of east anglia dr. neil degrasse tyson, ma in astronomy, phd in astrophysics from columbia university dr. edward o. wilson, bs, ms, and phd in biology, expert in myrmecology (the study of ants)

Explanation:

For vaccine - related research, experts in relevant biological and medical fields are better sources. Fauci in infectious diseases, Gilbert in genetics/biochemistry, and Wilson in biology are relevant. Tyson is in astrophysics.

Answer:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Sarah Gilbert, Dr. Edward O. Wilson