QUESTION IMAGE
Question
optional: ch 6 review
which was not one of the reasons that the creeks supported signing the treaties of traverse des sioux and mendota?
- they thought the government might take their land anyway, so at least the treaty would give them something in return
- it would provide money to buy blankets, tools, and food to survive for the next 50 years.
- it would give them a piece of land where they thought they could continue their traditional ways.
- it would give them full access to the waterways for continued fur trading and force the europeans to pay them fairly for the furs they pelt
The Treaties of Traverse des Sioux and Mendota were agreements where the Dakota ceded land to the U.S. government in exchange for annuities and a small reservation. The Dakota supported signing them out of fear of land seizure without compensation, need for immediate resources like food/tools, and hope to retain a small land base for their traditional life. There was no provision in these treaties for full waterway access to force fair European trade; this was not a reason for their support.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
D. It would give them full access to the waterways for continued fur trading and force the Europeans to pay them fairly for the beaver pelts