Question

part a: what warrant does this argument rely on?
making major changes in society requires commitment, sacrifice, and organization of activist groups like those in greensboro in the sixties, none of which are strong suits of social media.
social media connects people and makes it possible for a revolution to happen again like it did in the sixties in greensboro, but with even more people involved this time.
facebook and twitter users are more lazy than those who don’t have social media accounts, so they can’t make a real difference in the world.
today’s social issues aren’t as important or impactful as those that led the greensboro activists to protest.

Explanation:

The warrant is the underlying assumption in an argument. The first option posits that social - media lacks the key elements (commitment, sacrifice, organization) needed for major social change compared to activist groups in the sixties. This is a valid underlying assumption about the limitations of social media in facilitating major social change. The second option is incorrect as it goes against the idea that social media can't cause real change. The third option about user laziness is an unfounded stereotype not related to the main argument about social - media's ability to drive social change. The fourth option about the importance of social issues is off - topic; the focus is on social media's role, not the importance of issues.

Answer:

Making major changes in society requires commitment, sacrifice, and organization of activist groups like those in Greensboro in the sixties, none of which are strong suits of social media.