Question

passage: a student essay argues that shakespeares macbeth is still relevant because its \about ambition.\ the only support offered is that \lots of references are included. question: which choice best critiques the students reasoning? the universality of the theme obviates the need for evidence. the omission of primary references promotes interpretive originality. the simplicity of the argument demonstrates rhetorical effectiveness. the essays thematic claim lacks intellectual rigor due to the absence of textual analysis or scholarly engagement.

Explanation:

The student simply claims Macbeth is relevant because of the theme of ambition with minimal support. A strong literary - analysis essay requires textual analysis and scholarly engagement to have intellectual rigor. The other options either wrongly suggest lack of evidence is okay or over - praise the simplicity of the argument.

Answer:

The essay’s thematic claim lacks intellectual rigor due to the absence of textual analysis or scholarly engagement.