Question

1. was the person who drew this cartoon a supporter of jackson? how do you know?

Explanation:

To answer this, we need to analyze the cartoon's content (though the cartoon isn't shown here, we can use general principles). If the cartoon portrays Andrew Jackson in a positive light (e.g., showing him as heroic, effective, or sympathetic) or criticizes his opponents, the artist is likely a supporter. If it mocks or criticizes Jackson (e.g., depicting him as tyrannical, foolish), the artist is not a supporter. For example, if the cartoon shows Jackson successfully handling a crisis (like the Bank War or Indian Removal in a favorable way to him) or highlights his populist policies positively, that suggests support. If it uses negative imagery (like portraying him as a king, abusing power) or mocks his actions, it's opposition. Since the cartoon isn't provided, but assuming typical Jackson - era cartoons: often, cartoons critical of Jackson (like those mocking his "King Andrew" stance or his policies) were by non - supporters, while positive depictions (emphasizing his common - man appeal) were by supporters. To know for sure, we examine the cartoon's symbols, tone, and how it represents Jackson and his actions.

To determine if the cartoonist supported Jackson, we analyze the cartoon's portrayal of Jackson (not shown here). If it's positive (e.g., heroic, effective), the artist likely supported him; if negative (e.g., mocking, critical), they didn't. For example, pro - Jackson cartoons emphasized his populist appeal, while anti - Jackson ones criticized his power or policies.

Answer:

Without seeing the cartoon, we can't give a definite yes/no. But generally, if the cartoon portrays Jackson positively (e.g., as a champion of the common man, effective leader) the artist supported him; if negatively (e.g., as tyrannical, foolish) they didn't. To know, analyze the cartoon's imagery, tone, and representation of Jackson's actions/policies.