Question

question 1
what is a possible drawback to direct democracy? how might it be resolved?

Explanation:

One key drawback of direct democracy is that it is inefficient and impractical for large populations, as requiring all citizens to vote on every single policy, law, or issue demands massive time, resources, and widespread citizen engagement that is often unfeasible. Additionally, many citizens may lack the specialized knowledge to make informed decisions on complex technical matters (like economic policy or regulatory rules).
A common resolution is adopting a representative democracy system, where citizens elect knowledgeable, dedicated representatives to deliberate and vote on issues on their behalf. This streamlines the decision-making process for large groups. Complementing this with elements of direct democracy (like occasional referendums on major, high-stakes issues) can also balance efficiency with citizen input.

Answer:

1. Drawback: Direct democracy is highly inefficient and impractical for large populations, as it requires universal participation in every decision, and many citizens lack expertise for complex policy choices.
2. Resolution: Implement a representative democracy model (electing informed representatives to make decisions on behalf of citizens), paired with limited direct democracy tools (such as referendums for major issues) to balance efficiency and public input.