Question

read the excerpt from \for the era.\
as of early 1970 most states would have some laws
that would be affected. however, changes are being
made so rapidly as a result of title vii of the civil rights
act of 1964, it is likely that by the time the equal rights
amendment would become effective, no conflicting
state laws would remain.

read frankies paraphrase.
changes in state laws are happening so quickly, that,
despite there being an abundance of laws
discriminating against women now, there wont be any
once the era and the civil rights act of 1964 go into
effect.

what paraphrasing mistake has frankie made?
○ misrepresented the original meaning
○ added a personal opinion
○ made the paraphrase too short
○ matched the original wording too closely

Explanation:

The original text only states that most states had laws affected by the ERA, and changes from Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act would likely eliminate conflicting laws by the ERA's effective date. Frankie's paraphrase incorrectly claims the original refers to "an abundance of laws discriminating against women" and says both the ERA and 1964 Act will "go into effect" (the 1964 Act was already in place by 1970), altering the original meaning entirely.

Answer:

misrepresented the original meaning