Question

what criteria are you likely to use when evaluating someones argument? check any that apply.
whether the argument shows a lack of obvious bias
whether the author includes facts that support the argument
whether the arguments structure is easy to follow
whether the argument uses stories that make an emotional connection
whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments

Explanation:

To evaluate an argument, several valid criteria exist:

• Lack of obvious bias: A biased argument may be untrustworthy, so checking for this is reasonable.
• Facts supporting the argument: Facts provide evidence, so including them strengthens an argument's validity.
• Easy - to - follow structure: A clear structure helps in understanding the argument's logic.
• Acknowledging opposing arguments: Addressing counter - arguments shows thoroughness and can strengthen the argument by refuting them.
• Using stories for emotional connection: While emotional appeal can be part of persuasion, in a more critical evaluation of the argument's merit (like in academic or logical evaluation), this is less about the argument's logical strength and more about persuasion. But depending on the context of evaluation (e.g., persuasive writing), it could be considered. However, the other four are more core to evaluating the strength and validity of an argument.

Answer:

• whether the argument shows a lack of obvious bias
• whether the author includes facts that support the argument
• whether the argument’s structure is easy to follow
• whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments
• (Optional: whether the argument uses stories that make an emotional connection, depending on evaluation context)