Question

which best describes one main difference between rachel carsons silent spring and winona ladukes \a case for waawaatesi\?
carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while laduke is only concerned about a certain part of the environment.
carson speaks of a possible future, while laduke discusses only what has happened in the past.
carson believes that the past was just as bad as the present, while laduke believes that the present is worse than the past.
carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while laduke appeals to readers emotions.

Explanation:

Rachel Carson's Silent Spring is a well - known work that uses scientific facts and evidence to expose the environmental damage caused by pesticides. Winona LaDuke's "A Case for Waawaatesi" often appeals to the readers' emotions, especially in relation to indigenous environmental and cultural issues.

Answer:

D. Carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while LaDuke appeals to readers' emotions