Question

with which statement would the speaker of \money to us is of no value\ most likely agree?
the us government should buy land for people.
money will become important to future generations.
peace can be obtained if an agreement over land can be made.
it is necessary to share government land with other tribes.

Explanation:

The title "Money to Us Is of No Value" indicates the speaker prioritizes land/peace over money. Option A focuses on government buying land (involves money, conflicting with the title). Option B states money will matter to future generations, which contradicts the speaker's rejection of money's value. Option D centers on sharing land with other tribes, which is not implied by the title. Option C links peace to a land agreement, aligning with the idea that land (not money) is the key priority for the speaker.

Answer:

C. Peace can be obtained if an agreement over land can be made.