Question

90 miles to havana four corners anticipation activity
statement\tstrongly agree\tagree\tdisagree\tstrongly disagree

1. good luck charms work.\t\t\t\t

evidence supporting my opinion:

1. if it helps keep children safe, it is acceptable to separate them from their parents.\t\t\t\t

Explanation:

1. For the first statement, the stance is based on the lack of empirical evidence that good luck charms have causal effects on outcomes; perceived "success" is coincidental.
2. For the second statement, separating children from parents, even with safety claims, violates child psychological well-being and attachment needs, which are critical for long-term safety and health.

Answer:

1. Statement: Good luck charms work.

Stance: Strongly Disagree
Evidence supporting my opinion: There is no scientific evidence that good luck charms cause positive outcomes; any perceived benefits are due to coincidence or the placebo effect.

1. Statement: If it helps keep children safe, it is acceptable to separate them from their parents.

Stance: Strongly Disagree
Evidence supporting my opinion: Separation from parents often causes severe psychological harm to children, and safe, family-centered alternatives are the ethically and developmentally appropriate approach to protecting children.