Question

in her article \why should i vote?\ stephanie goggin crafts a well - organized and coherent argument. she states that every person of voting age who is registered should vote. she also argues that if you are not registered to vote, you should be. in conclusion, goggins argument is laid out in a thoughtful and thorough way that is convincing to readers. which element is missing from this evaluation?

• summary of the claim
• thesis statement
• concluding statement
• evaluation of evidence

Explanation:

The evaluation summarizes the claim (what Goggins argues), has a concluding statement (the last sentence), and the thesis of the evaluation is implied (about the argument being well - organized). But it doesn't evaluate the evidence Goggins used to support her argument. So the missing element is evaluation of evidence.

Answer:

D. evaluation of evidence