Question

controls, and with vigorous and open debate about the ethics of various genetic technologies. its likely that american companies will be the ones to eventually bring safe, reliable products to market. unfortunately, there have already been claims to fully eradicate any possibility of hiv in china has successfully edited genes in a set of twins in the medical community that a market. this could be a huge advancement for china that could bring incredible opportunities. but we must think, in the long run, is it worth the risk? would you genetically engineer your childs genes. this text is in the public domain. changes were made to the text for teaching purposes. genetic engineering by ruby. now answer numbers 1 through 5. choose the correct word or sentence for each of the following. 1. this idea of so - called \designer babies\ is a very controversial thing in society today and if it becomes a reality there must be many regulations put into place. a reality, b reality; c reality: d correct as is 2. genetic engineering is conscious changing of an organism genetic makeup in order too cause a difference in the outcome of traits. a to b two c tow d correct as is 3. this possibility could be life - saving to many children: along with the ability of a longer lifespan in people who had their genes edited. a children b children, c children; d correct as is

Explanation:

1. The original sentence is grammatically correct as it is. There is no need for a comma, semicolon or colon after "reality".
2. The word "too" is misused. The correct pre - position is "to" which is used to express purpose.
3. The colon is misused. There is no need for any punctuation mark after "children" as the sentence is a simple statement.

Answer:

1. D. correct as is
2. A. to
3. D. correct as is